home > Natural science > N 99 Federal Law ed. "on licensing of certain types of activities"

N 99 Federal Law ed. "on licensing of certain types of activities"

RUSSIAN FEDERATION

THE FEDERAL LAW

ABOUT MAKING CHANGES
IN THE FEDERAL LAW "ON AGRICULTURAL COOPERATION"

9) gives the credit cooperative, in the manner established by regulations of the Bank of Russia, mandatory instructions to eliminate identified violations;

10) has the right to prohibit a credit cooperative, in the manner established by regulations of the Bank of Russia, from attracting loans from members of the credit cooperative, associated members of the credit cooperative, admitting new members to the credit cooperative and issuing loans until the violations are eliminated or until the circumstances that served as the basis for issuing the order cease about the corresponding prohibition in the case of:

repeated violations within one year of the financial standards provided for in paragraph 11 (with the exception of subparagraph 6) of Article 40.1 of this Federal Law;

repeated violations within one year of the requirements provided for in Article 6, Article 7 (except for paragraph 3), Articles 7.2 and 7.3 of the Federal Law of August 7, 2001 N 115-FZ “On combating the legalization (laundering) of proceeds from crime, and financing of terrorism" and (or) repeated violations within one year of the requirements of regulations of the Bank of Russia, issued in accordance with the specified Federal Law;

a single violation within one year of the financial standard provided for in subparagraph 6 of paragraph 11 of Article 40.1 of this Federal Law;

one-time obstruction during one year of conducting an audit of the activities of a credit cooperative;

11) has the right to apply to the court for liquidation of the credit cooperative in the event of:

repeated failure within one year by the credit cooperative to eliminate the identified violations within the period established by the Bank of Russia;

a single failure within one year by a credit cooperative to comply with an order of the Bank of Russia prohibiting the credit cooperative from raising loans from members of the credit cooperative, associated members of the credit cooperative, admitting new members to the credit cooperative and issuing loans until the violations are eliminated or until the circumstances that served as the basis for issuing the order cease about the corresponding ban;

repeated violations by a credit cooperative of this Federal Law, other federal laws, other regulatory legal acts of the Russian Federation, and regulatory acts of the Bank of Russia within one year;

a single violation within one year by the credit cooperative of the requirements provided for in paragraph 3 of Article 31 of this Federal Law.

2. A credit cooperative has the right to appeal the actions (inaction) of the Bank of Russia to court.

3. A credit cooperative on a quarterly basis, independently or through associations of credit cooperatives, self-regulatory organizations of credit cooperatives, is obliged to submit to the Bank of Russia documents containing a report on its activities and accounting (financial) statements. A credit cooperative annually, independently or through associations of credit cooperatives, self-regulatory organizations of credit cooperatives, is obliged to submit to the Bank of Russia documents containing a report on the personal composition of its governing bodies, and in the event of a change in the composition of its governing bodies, it is obliged to submit this report no later than fifteen days after such changes. The forms, terms and procedure for drawing up and submitting the specified documents by the credit cooperative are established by the Bank of Russia."

1. This Federal Law comes into force on June 1, 2015, with the exception of provisions for which this article establishes other dates for their entry into force.

2. Clause 1, paragraphs one - five and seven - nine of subparagraph "c", subparagraph "d" of paragraph 3, paragraphs fourteen and sixteen of paragraph 4 of Article 1 of this Federal Law come into force on June 1, 2018.

3. Paragraph six of subparagraph “c” of paragraph 3 of Article 1 of this Federal Law comes into force on June 1, 2020.

The president
Russian Federation
V. PUTIN

Article 20. Procedure for suspension, renewal, termination of a license and cancellation of a license

1. The license is suspended by the licensing authority in the following cases:

1) bringing the licensee to administrative responsibility for failure to comply within the established time limit with an order to eliminate a gross violation of licensing requirements issued by the licensing authority in the manner established by the legislation of the Russian Federation;

2) imposing an administrative penalty on the licensee in the form of administrative suspension of activities for gross violation of licensing requirements in the manner established by the legislation of the Russian Federation.

2. In the event of a decision by a court or an official of the federal executive body exercising state control and supervision in the field of safe conduct of work related to the use of subsoil, industrial safety and safety of hydraulic structures, to bring the licensee to administrative liability for failure to comply with the order within the prescribed period to eliminate a gross violation of licensing requirements, the licensing authority again issues an order to eliminate a gross violation of licensing requirements and suspends, within 24 hours from the date of entry into force of this decision, the validity of the license for the period of execution of the newly issued order (except for the case provided for in paragraph 2 of part 1 of this article ).

3. In the event of a decision of a court or an official of the federal executive body exercising state control and supervision in the field of safe conduct of work related to the use of subsoil, industrial safety and safety of hydraulic structures, the licensing body imposes an administrative penalty in the form of administrative suspension of the activities of the licensee suspends the validity of the license within 24 hours from the date of entry into force of the license for the period of administrative suspension of the licensee’s activities.

4. The decision of the licensing authority to suspend the license, drawn up and brought to the attention of the licensee in the manner established by parts 2, 5 and 9 of Article 14 of this Federal Law, must indicate the names of works, services or addresses of places of performance of work, provision of services that constitute a licensed type of activity and in respect of which a court or an official of the federal executive body exercising state control and supervision in the field of safe conduct of work related to the use of subsoil, industrial safety and safety of hydraulic structures has made a decision to impose an administrative penalty in the form of an administrative suspension activities of the licensee or to bring the licensee to administrative liability for failure to comply within the established time limit with an order to eliminate a gross violation of licensing requirements.

5. Information about the suspension of a license is entered into the license register.

6. The validity of a license suspended in the case provided for in paragraph 1 of part 1 of this article is renewed by decision of the licensing authority from the day following the day of expiration of the deadline for execution of the newly issued order, or from the day following the day of signing the inspection report establishing the fact of early execution newly issued order.

7. The validity of a license suspended in the case provided for in paragraph 2 of part 1 of this article is renewed by decision of the licensing authority from the day following the day of expiration of the administrative suspension of the licensee’s activities, or from the day following the day of early termination of the execution of an administrative penalty in the form of administrative suspension of the licensee's activities by decision of a court or an official of the federal executive body exercising state control and supervision in the field of safe conduct of work related to the use of subsoil, industrial safety and the safety of hydraulic structures.

8. Information about the renewal of the license is entered into the license register.

9. Upon expiration of the period of administrative punishment in the form of administrative suspension of the licensee’s activities, the licensing authority must be notified in writing by the licensee that he has eliminated a gross violation of licensing requirements, which entailed the imposition of an administrative penalty in the form of administrative suspension of the licensee’s activities.

10. Upon expiration of the period of administrative punishment in the form of administrative suspension of the licensee’s activities or in the event of admission to the court or an official of the federal executive body exercising state control and supervision in the field of safe conduct of work related to the use of subsoil, industrial safety and safety of hydraulic structures, who imposed an administrative penalty in the form of administrative suspension of the licensee's activities, the licensee's petition for early termination of the execution of the administrative penalty in the form of administrative suspension of its activities, the licensing authority checks the information contained in the licensee's notification about the elimination of a gross violation of licensing requirements, which entailed an administrative penalty in the form administrative suspension of the licensee's activities, or in the specified petition.

11. If, within the established court, an official of the federal executive body exercising state control and supervision in the field of safe conduct of work related to the use of subsoil, industrial safety and safety of hydraulic structures, the period of administrative punishment in the form of administrative suspension of activities and suspension validity of the license or within the deadline established by the licensing authority for the execution of a newly issued order, the licensee has not eliminated a gross violation of licensing requirements, the licensing authority is obliged to apply to the court to cancel the license.

12. The license is canceled by a court decision based on the consideration of the licensing authority’s application to cancel the license.

13. The license is terminated due to the termination of the type of activity of the licensee for which the license was granted in the following cases:

1) submission by the licensee to the licensing authority of an application to terminate the licensed type of activity;

2) termination by an individual of activities as an individual entrepreneur in accordance with the legislation of the Russian Federation on state registration of legal entities and individual entrepreneurs;

3) termination of the activities of a legal entity in accordance with the legislation of the Russian Federation on state registration of legal entities and individual entrepreneurs (with the exception of reorganization in the form of transformation or merger if, on the date of state registration of the successor of the reorganized legal entities, each legal entity participating in the merger has a license for one and the same type of activity);

4) existence of a court decision to revoke the license.

14. No later than fifteen calendar days before the actual termination of the licensed type of activity, a licensee who intends to terminate this type of activity is obliged to submit or send to the licensing authority by registered mail with return receipt requested an application for termination of the licensed type of activity.

15. The licensee has the right to send to the licensing authority in the form of an electronic document signed with an electronic signature an application to terminate the licensed type of activity.

16. The licensing authority makes a decision to terminate the license within ten working days from the date of receipt:

1) applications from the licensee to terminate the licensed type of activity;

2) information from the federal executive body carrying out state registration of legal entities and individual entrepreneurs on the date of entry into the relevant unified state register of an entry on the termination of activities by a legal entity or on the termination by an individual of activities as an individual entrepreneur;

3) extracts from the court decision on the revocation of the license that has entered into legal force.

17. The decision of the licensing authority to terminate the license is formalized and brought to the attention of a legal entity or individual entrepreneur in the manner established by Article 14 of this Federal Law.

18. The license is terminated from the day the licensing authority makes a decision to terminate the license based on the licensee’s application to terminate the licensed type of activity, or from the date of making the relevant entries in the unified state register of legal entities or the unified state register of individual entrepreneurs, or from the date of entry into legal the force of a court decision to revoke a license.

Here's what it says on Wikipedia:

Alternative interpretation of the law

Interesting Facts

1) The federal law was submitted by Vladimir Putin to the State Duma just a month after delivering his famous speech in Munich. In this regard, it has been argued that the patriotic rhetoric of the Munich speech was intended to distract the Russian population from the subsequent agreement with NATO, as well as to justify increased military and intelligence spending to Westerners. Opponents of this argument argue that this is simply a coincidence.

2) 4 years later, Federal Law No. 99-FZ “On licensing of certain types of activities” was adopted with the same number of May 4, 2011. At the same time, the second law in no way cancels the first and does not even mention it. Most references to the first law were purged from the Internet in 2011 after public criticism from retired military personnel, including General Leonid Ivashov, Colonel Vladimir Kvachkov and deputy Viktor Ilyukhin. On the State Duma website, the link to the first law has been moved to the archive. Opponents of this argument argue that each year the numbering starts from the beginning, and suggest looking in the Garant system for laws with the same numbers.

3) And a third was found - Federal Law of 05/07/2013 N 99-FZ (as amended on 12/28/2013) "On amendments to certain legislative acts of the Russian Federation in connection with the adoption of the Federal Law "On the ratification of the Council of Europe Convention for the Protection of Individuals with regard to Automatic Processing of Personal Data" and the Federal Law "On Personal Data" (c) http://www. consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_156900/ ConsultantPlus, 1992-2014

As for the fact that there are as many as 3 laws with the number 99-FZ - this, in my opinion, is really normal. If you enter this number into the search system "Consultant", you will get 4 pages of federal laws, among which is the one you are looking for:
http://www.consultant.ru/search/?q=99-FZ

But the fact that this law is hidden, cleaned up and placed in an archive of links forces us to look at it in more detail.
The law itself can be read, for example, at this link:
http://base.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/onli … AW;n=68989
He is talking about the ratification of a certain Agreement between the states participating in the Partnership for Peace program and the Additional Protocol to it. The law also contains a Statement, which constantly refers to the Agreement. It turns out that, Even after reading the law, you will not understand its true meaning, because... he refers to a previously adopted NATO law (!!!). The Statement contains 6 points. Let's go in order:
1)

In the event that a member of the Force or a member of the civilian component leaves the service of the sending State and does not return to it, the authorities of the sending State shall immediately inform the authorities of the receiving State, including such information as may be necessary. The authorities of the sending State shall similarly inform the authorities of the receiving State of the absence of any member of the Force or member of the civilian component for more than 21 days.

The provision of paragraph 4 of Article III of the Agreement, obliging the authorities of the sending state to immediately inform the authorities of the receiving state about cases of failure to return to their homeland after dismissal from service of a military member of the Forces or a person from among the civilian component, also applies to cases of unauthorized leaving by these persons of the place of deployment of the Forces of the sending state if they have them weapons.

This is what paragraph 4 of Article III of the Agreement says:

Did you understand? According to this law, To enter the territory of the Russian Federation, NATO troops only need to “voluntarily” leave their place of deployment with weapons and transport and... enter the territory of the Russian Federation. The authorities, of course, will be “informed”.

by the words “own weapons” used in Article VI of the Agreement, the Russian Federation, on the basis of reciprocity, will understand the use and use of weapons, and by the words “consider favorably the requests of the receiving state” - the obligation of the authorities of the sending state to take into account the requirements of the receiving state regarding the carrying, transportation, transportation, use and use of weapons.

Article VI of the Agreement:

Military personnel may own and carry weapons provided they are authorized to do so by virtue of their orders. The authorities of the sending state will favorably consider requests from the receiving state regarding this issue.

That is, on the territory of the Russian Federation, NATO troops can use weapons if they have an order to do so. At the same time, they will take into account some things there.
3)

The list of crimes specified in subparagraph "c" of paragraph 2 of Article VII of the Agreement is not exhaustive and, in addition to those listed, in relation to the Russian Federation includes other crimes directed against the foundations of its constitutional order and security and provided for by the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation.

Subparagraph "c" of paragraph 2 and paragraph 3 of Article VII of the Agreement:

c) For the purposes of this paragraph and paragraph 3 of this article, the concept of an offense affecting state security includes:

i) high treason;

ii) sabotage, espionage or violation of legislation on the protection of state secrets of a given state or secret information relating to its national defense.

3. In cases where both states have the right to exercise jurisdiction, the following rules apply:

a) The military authorities of the sending State have the primary right to exercise jurisdiction over a member of the Force or a member of the civilian component in relation to:

i) offenses committed solely against the property or security of that State or against the person or property of another member of the Force or a member of a civilian component of that State or a dependent;

ii) offenses the commission of which was a consequence of an action or inaction in the performance of official duties.

b) For any other offences, the authorities of the receiving State have the primary right to exercise jurisdiction.

c) If the State having the pre-emptive right decides not to exercise jurisdiction, it shall notify the authorities of the other State as soon as possible. The authorities of the State having the pre-emptive right shall consider favorably the request of the authorities of another State to waive its right to exercise jurisdiction in cases where that other State attaches special importance to such refusal.

In general, our guests will be the Hosts here and will decide for themselves what is allowed and what is not. Paragraph 3) clearly states that the actions of a NATO soldier are subject to NATO jurisdiction. In addition, the crimes are described in an extremely unclear manner, which leaves no chance of justice.
4)

The Russian Federation, in accordance with paragraph 4 of Article VII of the Agreement, proceeds from the fact that the authorities of the sending state have the right to exercise their jurisdiction in the event that unidentified persons in the places of deployment of the Forces of the sending state commit crimes against that state, military personnel of its Forces, persons from among the civilian component or members of their families. When identifying the person who committed the crime, the procedure defined by the Agreement applies.

Clause 4 of Article VII of the Agreement:

The preceding provisions of this article do not imply the right of the military authorities of the sending State to exercise jurisdiction over persons who are nationals or permanent residents of the receiving State unless they are members of the military of the sending State.

Yes, the uprising of the population can be suppressed AS NATO WANTS. As I understand it, initially there was no such interpretation in the Agreement, i.e. P**** provided NATO with powers in the Russian Federation that do not exist in other treaty countries.
5)

the assistance referred to in subparagraph "a" of paragraph 6 of Article VII of the Agreement is provided in accordance with the legislation of the requested state. When providing legal assistance, the competent authorities of the states parties to the Agreement interact directly, and, if necessary, through the relevant higher authorities.

Subparagraph "a" of paragraph 6 of Article VII of the Agreement

a) The authorities of the receiving and sending States shall assist each other in carrying out all necessary investigative measures to investigate offenses and in collecting and producing evidence, including the confiscation and, where appropriate, transfer of items related to the offence. However, the transfer of such items may be subject to their return within the time frame determined by the transferring authority.

In a word, they will be judged according to NATO laws.
6)

The Russian Federation allows the import of goods and vehicles named in paragraphs 2, 5 and 6 of Article XI of the Agreement, equipment and material items named in paragraph 4 of Article XI of the Agreement, intended for the needs of the Forces, in accordance with the conditions of the customs regime of temporary import established by the customs legislation of the Russian Federation. Moreover, such import is carried out with a complete conditional exemption from customs duties, taxes, fees, with the exception of customs fees for storage, customs clearance of goods and for similar services outside the designated places or working hours of customs authorities, and for the periods stipulated by the Agreement , if such terms are expressly specified in the Agreement.

Paragraphs 2-4 of Article XI of the Agreement

2.a) Temporary import and export of official vehicles of the Force or the civilian component, carried out within the scope of their authority, is carried out without the collection of duties and fees upon presentation of a certificate drawn up in the form specified in the annex to this Agreement.

b) Temporary import of vehicles of the Forces or the civilian component outside the scope of their powers is carried out in accordance with paragraph 4 of this article, and their export - in accordance with paragraph 8.

c) Service vehicles of the Force and the civilian component are exempt from any taxes associated with the use of these vehicles on the roads.

3. Official documents bearing an official seal are not subject to inspection by customs authorities. Couriers, whatever their status, carrying such documents must carry with them an individual travel order issued in accordance with paragraph 2 (b) of Article III. This order must indicate the number of items being transported and confirm that they contain only official documents.

4. The Force may import, subject to exemption from mandatory customs duties, equipment for its needs and a reasonable quantity of food and supplies intended solely for the use of the Force and, where permitted by the receiving State, for the use of the civilian component and dependents. Such importation is subject to the presentation to the customs authority at the place of entry into the territory of the receiving state, along with such customs documents that will be agreed upon by the receiving and sending states, a certificate drawn up in a form agreed upon by the receiving and sending state and signed by a person authorized by the sending state by the state. Information on the appointment of persons authorized to sign such certificates, with samples of their signatures and seals used, is sent to the customs authorities of the receiving state.

5. A member of the Force or a member of the civilian component upon initial entry into the territory of a receiving State for service therein, or their dependent upon initial entry into that State to reside with them, shall be entitled to import duty-free their personal effects and furniture for the duration of such service.

6 . Military personnel of the Forces or employees of the civilian component have the right to temporarily import, with exemption from mandatory customs duties, their vehicles intended for the personal use of them and their dependents. This article, however, does not establish an obligation to exempt taxes levied in connection with the use of roads by private vehicles.

Come, settle in, and take your dependents!

And lastly - Additional Protocol:

States parties to this Additional Protocol to the Agreement between the States Parties to the North Atlantic Treaty and other States Participating in the Partnership for Peace on the Status of Their Forces, hereinafter referred to as the “Agreement”;

Considering the fact that the death penalty is not provided for in the national legislation of some States Parties to the Agreement;

have agreed as follows:

ARTICLE I

Each State Party to this Additional Protocol, to the extent that it has jurisdiction under the provisions of the Agreement, shall not carry out the death penalty against any member of the Force or member of the civilian component and their dependents from any other State Party to this Additional Protocol.

ARTICLE II

1. This Protocol is open for signature by any Party that has signed the Agreement.

2 . This Protocol is subject to ratification, acceptance or approval. Instruments of ratification, acceptance or approval shall be deposited with the Government of the United States of America, which shall notify all signatory States of each such deposit.

3. This Protocol shall enter into force 30 days after the deposit of an instrument of ratification, acceptance or approval by three signatory States, at least one of which is a Party to NATO SOFA and one of which is a State that has accepted an invitation to participate in the Partnership for Peace. and signatories of the Partnership for Peace Framework Document.

4 . This Protocol shall enter into force with respect to each other signatory State on the date of deposit of its instrument of ratification, acceptance or approval with the Government of the United States of America.

All about the same thing - you can't touch a NATO soldier! He can kill you (in accordance with orders), but you cannot kill him!

So it goes.
CRIMEANASH-CRIMEANASH-CRIMEANASH!

Edited by Marlon (08/17/2014 08:02)

http://conspiracytheory.mybb.ru/viewtopic.php?id=1695

Agreement with NATO N 99-FZ - Federal Law of the Russian Federation No. 99-FZ of June 7, 2007 (Draft Law No. 410940-4) "On the ratification of the Agreement between the states parties to the North Atlantic Treaty and other states participating in the Partnership for Peace program" , on the status of their Forces dated June 19, 1995 and the Additional Protocol thereto,” adopted by the State Duma on May 23, 2007, approved by the Federation Council on May 25, 2007, initiated and signed by Vladimir Putin 4 months after the speech in Munich.

The agreement of June 19, 1995 is ratified, with minor clarifications. The agreement deals with the principles of jurisdiction and punishment over deserters and military personnel who have committed a crime while they are on foreign territory. The procedure for customs and cargo transit is also discussed.

Alternative interpretation of the law

According to an analysis of the treaty conducted by journalists and independent experts, according to this law, NATO troops have the right to freely deploy on Russian territory, provide support to the Government of the Russian Federation, suppress popular unrest and carry out other activities.

Interesting Facts

2) 4 years later, with the same number, Federal Law No. 99-FZ of May 4, 2011 “On licensing of certain types of activities” was adopted. At the same time, the second law in no way cancels the first and does not even mention it. Most references to the first law were purged from the Internet in 2011 after public criticism from retired military personnel, including General Leonid Ivashov, Colonel Vladimir Kvachkov and deputy Viktor Ilyukhin. On the State Duma website, the link to the first law has been moved to the archive. Opponents of this argument argue that each year the numbering starts from the beginning, and suggest looking in the Garant system for laws with the same numbers.

3) And the third was found - Federal Law dated 05/07/2013 N 99-FZ (as amended on 12/28/2013) “On amendments to certain legislative acts of the Russian Federation in connection with the adoption of the Federal Law “On the ratification of the Council of Europe Convention for the Protection of Individuals” during automated processing of personal data" and the Federal Law "On Personal Data" (c)

http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_156900/ ConsultantPlus, 1992-2014

We missed a unique sensation. In Russia, two current federal laws have been adopted with the same numbers, but different in essence and scope. Something unthinkable. They were adopted by United Russia with an interval of two years and signed by Presidents Putin and Medvedev with the consent of the Federation Council. Surely other politicians knew about them - Zyuganov, Zhirinovsky, S. Mironov, Gudkov, Yavlinsky, but they remained silent and are still silent. Questions: why are they accepted, why are they silent and what does it all mean?

In general, this does not happen - so that different federal laws are assigned the same numbers. This is nonsense, confusion, chaos, scandal at last. There is no need to talk about a clerical error here. The mistake in the numbering could have been made by the young secretary of the village administration, and she would have corrected it if she discovered it. But for this to be done in the offices of the highest government bodies of Russia with their computer records and dozens of qualified lawyers is incredible. Moreover, seven months have already passed since the publication of the second law. There can only be one explanation for this - a deliberate action on the part of Putin and Medvedev. So, there is something to talk about.

On the ratification of the Agreement between the states parties to the North Atlantic Treaty and other states participating in the Partnership for Peace program on the status of their Forces dated June 19, 1995 and the Additional Protocol thereto." Adopted by the State Duma on May 23, 2007, approved by the Federation Council on May 25, 2007.Alreadysorry for the dry ones data.

Second Federal Law of May 4, 2011 N 99-FZ "On licensing of certain types of activities". Adopted by the State Duma on April 22, 2011, approved by the Federation Council on April 27, 2011.

Both laws N 99-ФЗ published in Rossiyskaya Gazeta, which means they come into force. The first - June 16, 2007 http://www.rg.ru/2007/06/16/partnesrstvo-doc.html. The second - May 6, 2011 http://www.rg.ru/2011/05/06/license-dok.html. At the same time, the second law in no way cancels the first and does not even mention it. Something from the realm of the unreal, contempt for civil norms of behavior or a special operation.

It is interesting to find evidence today of the existence of the first law N 99-ФЗ about NATO on the Russian Internet is almost impossible, except in the newspaper archive. All mentions of him, including the State Duma websites, were cleared a year ago. This only confirms the version of his deliberate concealment. The publication in Rossiyskaya Gazeta is the only confirmation of the existence of this law. And that’s good - it means that the law on NATO still exists.

It is significant that the second law N 99-ФЗ(On licensing) appeared when assessments of the treacherous nature of the first law were heard N 99-ФЗ ratifying the agreement with NATO. They sounded on the Internet and from people truly opposed to Putin. General Leonid Ivashov, Colonel Vladimir Kvachkov and the late Viktor Ilyukhin spoke about this in particular. Could this be the reason for Putin’s great fear and desire to hide “the ends in the water” in any way, let’s figure it out.

After all, it was Vladimir Putin who introduced the bill on NATO. It was received by a faction from the United Russia party, whose leader is Putin. The law was approved by the Federation Council, consisting of senators actually appointed by Putin. Putin himself signed the law. Only in the hands of Putin is the possibility of a duplicate law with the same number appearing as a cover. This is in the spirit of his FSB antics. A considerable number of official trolls, including Nikolai Starikov, suddenly began to claim that the law on NATO does not exist in nature, which clearly indicates a special operation from Putin. These FSB agents contemptuously continue to consider the people as cattle and at the same time prostrate themselves in front of NATO for the sake of security, you have to understand. What are they trying to hide?

Oddities of the adoption of the law on NATO

By the way, even the text published in Rossiyskaya Gazeta does not allow us to understand the true meaning of the law on NATO N 99-ФЗ, since it only puts into effect some previously adopted NATO documents. “RG” does not have these documents. Although they are the ones who reveal the true essence of the adopted law.

I will say more, neither the deputies saw these documents when adopting the law, nor the senators when approving it. It’s strange to say, but the original founding documents of NATO with their translation were not shown even to the legal departments of the State Duma and the Federation Council, which they especially emphasized in their conclusions. This is where the completely suspicious nature of his acceptance becomes apparent. Did United Russia accept a pig in a poke? Or not a cat, but a larger predatory animal?

The adoption of the law in the State Duma was postponed several times. It was adopted with a bang among other minor initiatives, seventy-second of the day- as if in between times. Surely at this time the meeting room was almost empty. The bill was not signed by the heads of the relevant committees and the legal department of the Federation Council.

Documents confirming this are still available when typing the phrase “Electronic registration card for bill No. 410940-4.” The surviving copies of State Duma documents also allow us to judge this. Fortunately, those who understood or suspected the danger of this law, and guessed the unprecedented meanness and corruption of the current rulers, kept these copies. By the way, restricting access to electronic references does not mean that the NATO law does not apply.

How so? Why did Vladimir Putin very persistently push through this law with NATO, and after its adoption suddenly began to frantically hide everything? After all, there is no one else to do this except him. What are the reasons for this? And in general, are we dealing with a normal person? Or does his arrogance and contempt no longer have boundaries? Does he need unlimited power and monopoly again for exactly this?

Putin, of course, has shown backyard depth before when signing international agreements, as was the case between Gazprom and Naftogaz, which led to the well-known confrontation with Ukraine three years ago http://www.newsland.ru/news/detail/id/330449 /. and the recent conviction of Yulia Tymoshenko (whom he betrayed, by the way). But here the case is still different - the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Government of the Russian Federation, the State Duma, the Federation Council, with their legal departments were involved. And the counterparty here was the whole of NATO.

What preceded the adoption of the NATO law

Meanwhile, the adoption of the law on NATO N 99-ФЗ was only the final stage in the actions of Vladimir Putin, and before him Boris Yeltsin, in this direction. That is, this action was not one-time - a clear sequence of their common steps is visible. Especially Putin. Thus, this was preceded by the signing in Vilnius on April 21, 2005 on behalf of the Russian Federation of the Agreement between the states parties to the North Atlantic Treaty and other states participating in the Partnership for Peace program on the status of their Forces dated June 19, 1995. Additional Protocol to signed to him in Sofia on April 28, 2006.

The formal meaning of these NATO documents is that the 1995 Agreement regulates the legal status of military personnel, civilian personnel and members of their families of one of the Parties located on the territory of the other Party with its consent, by applying to them the provisions of the Agreement between the NATO Parties on the status of their Forces dated June 19, 1951. Some of the documents can be viewed here http://www.nato.int/docu/other/ru/sofa.htm

The sinister essence of the law

The format of the article does not allow for a detailed analysis of the voluminous NATO agreements and protocols. Let us dwell only on that part of them that reveals the essence of the law N 99-FZ. Let's start with the fact that the NATO Agreement of June 19, 1951 provides for equality of rights between all its Parties, but in relation to Russia, there seems to be no such equality.

Already in the explanatory note to the law on NATO N 99-ФЗ it is said: “Events in the field of military cooperation between Russia and NATO are taking place both on Russian territory and beyond its borders.” But what does “beyond” mean? The document does not say that military events can take place on the territory of NATO countries, as Putin’s representative in the Duma explained. This means only on Russian territory. Possibly also Ukraine, Belarus and other CIS countries. In any case, it is impossible to assume that NATO will allow Russia to station its troops with weapons on its territory. This is not why NATO expanded.

Don’t be confused by the words “cooperation” and “partnership for peace” either. They, as you will see, imply military action. NATO itself is a military organization, and the most powerful and aggressive in the world that currently exists. Yugoslavia, Iraq and Libya convincingly experienced this for themselves. And Putin signed the law N 99-ФЗ already after Iraq.

Moreover, the draft law on NATO N 99-ФЗ was introduced by Putin to the Duma just a month (!) after his sensational Munich speech on October 27, 2007, which many regarded as the beginning of a new Cold War between Russia and NATO. In it, Putin accused NATO and the United States of aggression towards other countries of the world and the desire to rule the world, which then greatly inspired supporters of the “national leader” and FSB agents. And then suddenly such a quiet and inconspicuous initiative under the law on NATO N 99-FZ. Obviously, this speech by Putin was a performance and a banal deception to divert attention. Lies, hypocrisy and meanness there really have no boundaries.

So, the Agreement provides for the presence of those same NATO troops, as well as their civilian personnel and family members, on Russian territory. I note that this is not required for May 9 parades or joint exercises, which end quickly. An agreement to come to us with families and servants is needed only in the event of a very long NATO stay in Russia. And Putin agreed to this. Moreover, the Western alliance provides for the import of weapons, military equipment, transport and fuel. Not just provided, but as it is said “without payment of customs duties and taxes” - that is, on preferential terms, directly, without beating around the bush or delays.

It follows from this that NATO troops can remain throughout Russia for a long time with weapons, logistics and equipment, including aircraft, ships, heavy and strategic weapons, since there are no restrictions in the documents in this regard, except for the “good” will of Vladimir Putin, of course, if he becomes president again.

This is actually stated in paragraph 6 of the NATO law N 99-ФЗ: “The Russian Federation, in accordance with paragraph 11 of ArticleXI declares that it allows the import into the customs territory of the Russian Federation of petroleum products intended for use in the operation of official vehicles, aircraft and ships belonging to the Forces.”

“as regards the arrival and departure of forces or members of their personnel, they are not subject to the rules of the passport and visa regime and are not subject to immigration controls when entering or leaving the territory of the receiving State” (Article III of the Agreement of June 19, 1951).

Curious, isn't it? The doors open wide. By the way, there is no mention of different vehicles even in the basic NATO Agreement of June 19, 1951. This is an innovation from Vladimir Putin, his expansion of NATO powers specifically for Russia. This is also stated in the conclusions of the legal departments of the State Duma and the Federation Council.

It is interesting to know what status NATO troops have in Russia according to the law N 99-ФЗ- what can they do here, what can’t they do and what responsibility do they bear for this? It turns out that they can do almost everything with us that the enemy’s armed forces are capable of doing on the territory of a occupied country, but at the same time they will never bear any responsibility to Russia and our people. This is not my speculation:

Under the Agreements of 1951 and 1995 “The receiving State [Russia] shall exercise criminal and disciplinary jurisdiction in all cases, except in cases of crimes committed solely against the property or security of the sending State [US] or its Forces, as well as crimes committed as a result of any act (inaction) in the performance of official duties. For such crimes, as well as crimes punishable under the laws of the sending but not the receiving State, the sending State [the United States] shall have jurisdiction.”

This difficult-to-understand legal formulation means that in the event of an attack on NATO personnel in Russia, as well as their weapons, property, or even in the event of provocation, NATO members can commit any actions, including war crimes, on supposedly legal grounds. In this case, they will not bear any responsibility for the consequences. The United States does not extradite its military to an international court and does not condemn them themselves.

That is, there will be no reparations or criminal prosecution of NATO military personnel, as is expected in relation to the aggressor party and war criminals in the event of war. Putin and United Russia freed them from this by law N 99-ФЗ. For example, if a waiter at a NATO canteen (civilian staff) is attacked in an alley, then you will receive, please, a volley of rocket launchers into a Russian village legally. They took the bayonet from a drunken NATO soldier - wipe the cities of Smolensk, Kursk from the face of the earth... and no responsibility!?!

4) Russian Federation in accordance with paragraph 4 of the articleVII
The agreement is based on the fact that the authorities of the sending state [USA] have the right to exercise their jurisdiction in the event that unidentified persons [read - units of the Russian Army, the Ministry of Internal Affairs, partisans] commit crimes in the places of deployment of the Forces of the sending state [USA] against this state, its military personnel Forces, members of the civilian component or members of their families.

Well, isn’t V. Putin “well done”!? What documents does he push and sign? How sweepingly NATO is doing things in Russia! “Patriot”, badge-fly... “Excellently protects” the people of Russia and the sovereignty of the state from external aggression and interference in internal affairs, so to speak. “Word for word” according to the Constitution of the Russian Federation, as he swore.

Needless to say, in practice this will mean complete permissiveness of NATO troops in Russia, especially if this is part of their “execution of official duties” (following orders). Of course, NATO members will not fail to carry out a provocation against themselves in this case themselves. In other words, this means much worse than would have happened even in the event of an intervention or NATO declaration of war on Russia. Much worse. Because in that case, the Russian army would have the right and duty to protect our country, citizens, property with all forces and means. The right to compensation for damages at the end of hostilities, not to mention the protection of the rights of prisoners, the Red Cross and the like.

And now, thanks to the NATO law N 99-ФЗ The Russian army, internal troops and people do not have such a right. It was allegedly deprived of us by some V. Putin, S. Mironov, “United Russia” and senators who voluntarily adopted this law without our consent. They decided to invite NATO to Russia and signed a law giving this aggressive foreign military force a free hand. It is no coincidence that Putin is hiding the law on NATO N 99-ФЗ, and the rest are quietly silent. And if they are considered the authorities and citizens of Russia, then what should enemies and traitors look like?

NATO Law N 99-ФЗ besides, it is very difficult to denounce. This can only happen a year after the Russian Government notifies the US Government, and even then “with the exception of the settlement of outstanding claims made before the denunciation enters into force” (Article VI of the Agreement of June 19, 1995). A lot of such claims can be invented and this can last will last forever. The military occupation of Russia is ensured by this Putin law.

Who is the NATO law aimed at?

Let us ask ourselves why Putin needs the opportunity to invite NATO troops with weapons and logistics to Russia? After all, this is precisely the application of the law N 99-ФЗ probably one hundred percent. Against whom was he going to use the military force of the North Atlantic Pact, other than the people and army of our country? And we will come to the answer that it is against us - there is no one else against us. And any opportunity for this can arise - for example, a danger to Putin’s power.

If there had been another reason, for example, the threat of communism, then Zyuganov’s Communist Party of the Russian Federation would have shouted about it at all corners. However, he remains silent even on the eve of the next elections, having access to television. If we were against instability in general, then what kind of instability was there in 2007? On the contrary, everything was stable, vertically built, oil revenues overflowed, which we heard a lot about from Putin. For the same reason, the adoption of the NATO law could not be a tactical move to gain time, ensuring the possibility of Russia's development. The entire course of subsequent events firmly proved this.

After all, all his actions to disarmament, disorganization, reduction of the army, aviation and navy of Russia, to destroy the military industry, science, education, agriculture, and mobilization resources organically fit into the outline of Putin’s hidden relations with NATO. By soldering, drugging and reducing the peoples of Russia, especially the Russian people. Putin is destroying the Russian army, people and a once powerful power, and NATO is his all-round assistant, guarantee and support in this - this is the answer.

Putin behaves exactly as if he is a NATO agent, a traitor in the Kremlin, still afraid of exposure. Only in this case everything falls into place. And bearing in mind that NATO is controlled by radical Chabad Jews from New York with their hateful plans against all humanity (from the Slavs to the majority of Jews), it becomes completely uneasy.

All the lawlessness in Russia and its robbery, violations of the Constitution, the absence of referendums on important issues in the life of the state (which certainly includes the law on NATO) fit perfectly into this scheme N 99-ФЗ). The abolition of free elections is easily explained - in fact, the unconstitutional seizure and retention of power by a group of people (NATO, Jewish agents and their servants?). Now it’s clear why. It turns out that it’s not a matter of thirst for power and money, but rather very far-reaching plans - Putin’s systemic plans with NATO to destroy and ruin Russia.

Federal Law of June 7, 2007 N 99-FZ
"On the ratification of the Agreement between the states parties to the North Atlantic Treaty and other states participating in the Partnership for Peace program on the status of their Forces of June 19, 1995 and the Additional Protocol thereto"

Ratify the Agreement between the states parties to the North Atlantic Treaty and other states participating in the Partnership for Peace program on the status of their forces dated June 19, 1995, signed on behalf of the Russian Federation in the city of Vilnius on April 21, 2005, and the Additional Protocol to the Agreement between States parties to the North Atlantic Treaty and other States participating in the Partnership for Peace program on the status of their forces dated June 19, 1995, signed on behalf of the Russian Federation in the city of Sofia on April 28, 2006, with the following statement:

in order to implement the Agreement between the states parties to the North Atlantic Treaty and other states participating in the Partnership for Peace program on the status of their Forces dated June 19, 1995, the Russian Federation proceeds from the following understanding of the following provisions of the Agreement between the Parties to the North Atlantic Treaty on the status of their Forces dated June 19, 1951 (hereinafter referred to as the Agreement):

1) the provision of paragraph 4 of Article III of the Agreement, obliging the authorities of the sending state to immediately inform the authorities of the receiving state about cases of failure to return to their homeland after dismissal from service of a military member of the Forces or a person from among the civilian component, also applies to cases of unauthorized leaving by these persons of the place of deployment of the Forces of the sending state when whether they have weapons;

2) by the words “to own weapons” used in Article VI of the Agreement, the Russian Federation, on the basis of reciprocity, will understand the use and use of weapons, and by the words “consider favorably the requests of the receiving state” - the obligation of the authorities of the sending state to take into account the requirements of the receiving state regarding the carrying, transportation, transportation, use and use of weapons;

3) the list of crimes specified in subparagraph "c" of paragraph 2 of Article VII of the Agreement is not exhaustive and, in addition to those listed in relation to the Russian Federation, includes other crimes directed against the foundations of its constitutional order and security and provided for by the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation;

4) The Russian Federation, in accordance with paragraph 4 of Article VII of the Agreement, proceeds from the fact that the authorities of the sending state have the right to exercise their jurisdiction in the event that unidentified persons in the places of deployment of the Forces of the sending state commit crimes against this state, military personnel of its Forces, and civilians component or their family members. When identifying the person who committed the crime, the procedure defined by the Agreement applies;

5) the assistance referred to in subparagraph “a” of paragraph 6 of Article VII of the Agreement is provided in accordance with the legislation of the requested state. When providing legal assistance, the competent authorities of the states parties to the Agreement interact directly, and, if necessary, through the relevant higher authorities;

6) The Russian Federation allows the import of goods and vehicles named in paragraphs 2 and 6 of Article XI of the Agreement, equipment and material items named in paragraph 4 of Article XI of the Agreement, intended for the needs of the Forces, in accordance with the conditions of the customs regime of temporary import established customs legislation of the Russian Federation. Moreover, such import is carried out with a complete conditional exemption from customs duties, taxes, fees, with the exception of customs fees for storage, customs clearance of goods and for similar services outside the designated places or working hours of customs authorities, and for the periods stipulated by the Agreement , if such terms are expressly specified in the Agreement.

The Russian Federation proceeds from the fact that the procedure and conditions for the import of goods named in paragraph 4 of Article XI of the Agreement and intended for the needs of the Forces will be regulated by separate agreements on the dispatch and acceptance of Forces between the Russian Federation and the sending state.

No provisions of Article XI, including paragraphs 3 and , limit the right of the customs authorities of the Russian Federation to take all necessary measures to monitor compliance with the conditions for the import of goods and vehicles provided for in Article XI of the Agreement, if such measures are necessary in accordance with customs legislation Russian Federation.

The Russian Federation assumes that the sending state submits to the customs authorities of the Russian Federation confirmation that all goods and vehicles imported into the Russian Federation in accordance with the provisions of Article XI of the Agreement and separate agreements on the dispatch and acceptance of forces between the Russian Federation and the sending state, may be used exclusively for the purposes for which they were imported. If they are used for other purposes, all customs duties provided for by the legislation of the Russian Federation must be paid in relation to such goods and vehicles, and other requirements established by the legislation of the Russian Federation must be met.

Transit of these goods and vehicles is carried out in accordance with the customs legislation of the Russian Federation.

The Russian Federation, in accordance with paragraph 11 of Article XI, declares that it allows the import into the customs territory of the Russian Federation of petroleum products intended for use in the operation of official vehicles, aircraft and ships belonging to the Forces or the civilian component, with exemption from customs duties and taxes in accordance with the requirements and restrictions established by the legislation of the Russian Federation.

The Russian Federation allows the import of vehicles named in paragraphs 2 and 6 of Article XI of the Agreement and intended for personal use by persons from the civilian component and members of their families in accordance with the conditions of temporary import established by the legislation of the Russian Federation.

The Russian Federation proceeds from the fact that customs clearance of goods imported (exported) by persons from among the civilian component and members of their families, intended exclusively for their personal use, including goods for initial establishment, is carried out without the collection of customs duties, with the exception of customs duties for storage, customs clearance of goods and for similar services outside the designated places or working hours of customs authorities;

7) The Russian Federation also assumes that documents and accompanying materials sent to its competent authorities under the Agreement will be accompanied by their duly certified translations into Russian.

President of Russian Federation

Moscow Kremlin

The purpose of the ratified Agreement is to resolve the issue of the status of the Forces participating in events in the field of military-technical cooperation between Russia and NATO, taking place both on the territory of the Russian Federation and abroad. In accordance with the Agreement, the participating states will apply the provisions of the Agreement between the Parties to the North Atlantic Treaty on the Status of Their Forces dated June 19, 1951, which regulates the entire range of legal issues related to the presence of the armed forces of one participating state on the territory of another. In particular, it determines the status of military personnel, the civilian component and dependents, regulates the jurisdiction of the Parties, liability for damage, and the provision of customs and tax benefits. In this case, it is possible to conclude separate agreements between the receiving and sending Parties.

In accordance with the ratified Protocol, the Parties undertake not to carry out the death penalty against persons of any other state having jurisdiction.

Since certain provisions of the 1951 Agreement do not comply with the legislation of the Russian Federation, the Law contains an interpretative statement setting out their understanding of the Russian Federation. In particular, these provisions relate to immediate reporting of cases of unauthorized abandonment of Force locations by military personnel or civilians with weapons; carrying, using and using weapons; a list of crimes against the foundations of the constitutional system of the Russian Federation; jurisdiction when committing crimes in the locations of the Forces; providing legal assistance; customs regime for the import of goods and vehicles, as well as the provision of documents with a certified translation into Russian.

Federal Law of June 7, 2007 N 99-FZ "On the ratification of the Agreement between the states parties to the North Atlantic Treaty and other states participating in the Partnership for Peace program on the status of their Forces dated June 19, 1995 and the Additional Protocol thereto"

This Federal Law comes into force 10 days after the day of its official publication